UN Security Council Criticizes ICC Chief Prosecutor Over Gaza Inaction

INDONESIAUPDATES.COM – News En – The criticism directed at Karim Asad Ahmad Khan, the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), from members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), centers around his failure to issue arrest warrants for those responsible for alleged massacres in the Gaza Strip. This critique highlights the perceived lack of action by the ICC in response to what some describe as genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians by Israeli officials.

During a Security Council meeting, Libyan envoy Taher M. El-Sonni drew a parallel between the atrocities in Gaza and the Holocaust, urging Khan to pursue those involved in what he termed a modern “holocaust.” El-Sonni questioned Khan’s prioritization of cases and called for a focus on the more straightforward situation in Gaza, criticizing the ICC’s inaction as potentially indicative of political influence rather than judicial independence.

Algerian Deputy Ambassador Nacim Gaouaoui supported El-Sonni’s criticisms by emphasizing the need for the ICC to resist external pressures and uphold the rule of law impartially. He underscored the necessity for the ICC to approach the Gaza situation with the seriousness it demands to avoid double standards and maintain its credibility as a neutral judicial body.

Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia further criticized the ICC, noting its inactivity regarding Palestinian issues since 2015. He suggested this inactivity might be influenced by external political pressures, particularly from the United States, which has threatened sanctions against the ICC if it investigates individuals from the US or its allies. Nebenzia’s remarks reflect a broader accusation that the ICC operates under the influence of Western powers, thus undermining its independence and neutrality.

This collective critique from various international representatives suggests a significant concern about the ICC’s impartiality and effectiveness in addressing crimes in the Gaza Strip and broader Palestinian territories. It raises questions about the court’s ability to function independently of political influences and fulfill its mandate to prosecute serious international crimes.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)


Q1: What is the main criticism directed at the ICC Chief Prosecutor, Karim Asad Ahmad Khan, by the UN Security Council members? A1: The primary criticism is Khan’s failure to issue arrest warrants for those responsible for alleged massacres in the Gaza Strip, which some members view as a failure to address serious international crimes effectively.

Q2: What specific comparison did the Libyan envoy, Taher M. El-Sonni, make during his criticism? A2: El-Sonni compared the atrocities in Gaza to the Holocaust carried out by Nazi Germany during World War II, describing the situation as a modern “holocaust.”

Q3: What concerns did Algerian Deputy Ambassador Nacim Gaouaoui express regarding the ICC? A3: Gaouaoui emphasized the need for the ICC to uphold the rule of law impartially and resist external pressures. He stressed the importance of avoiding double standards and maintaining the court’s credibility as a neutral judicial body.

Q4: How did Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia characterize the ICC? A4: Nebenzia characterized the ICC as a “puppet body” under the control of Western powers, particularly criticizing its lack of action on Palestinian issues since 2015 and suggesting that external political pressures, especially from the United States, influence its operations.

Q5: What specific concern did Nebenzia raise regarding the influence of the United States on the ICC? A5: Nebenzia highlighted that the US has threatened sanctions against the ICC if it investigates individuals from the US or its allies, implying that this threat might be a reason for the ICC’s inaction on issues related to Palestine.

Q6: What does this criticism suggest about the perceived independence and neutrality of the ICC? A6: The criticism suggests significant concerns about the ICC’s independence and neutrality. It raises questions about whether the court can operate without political influence and fulfill its mandate to prosecute serious international crimes impartially.

Q7: What actions are the critics urging the ICC to take regarding the situation in Gaza? A7: Critics are urging the ICC to issue arrest warrants and take decisive legal actions against Israeli officials responsible for alleged genocidal acts and ethnic cleansing against Palestinians in Gaza.


FOLLOW INDONESIAUPDATES.COM ON GOOGLE NEWS