INDONESIAUPDATES.COM, News En – The on-site inspection of the crime scenes in the case of Vina and Eky’s deaths, which involves six convicted individuals, commenced today in Cirebon, West Java. The inspection started at SMP 11, located on Jalan Perjuangan No. 48, Kelurahan Karyamulya, Kesambi District, which is reportedly the location where the stone-throwing and chase occurred between the perpetrators and Eky, who was riding with Vina and her friends.
A large crowd gathered around SMP 11 to witness the local inspection, drawing significant public interest. The legal team representing the six convicts, led by Otto Hasibuan, was present at the site, along with key witnesses who had testified in previous sessions of the Peninjauan Kembali (PK) trial at the Cirebon District Court. One of the witnesses, Dede, who initially claimed to have seen the stone-throwing incident, later retracted his testimony, admitting that it was false.
In addition to the legal team and witnesses, former Purwakarta Regent Dedi Mulyadi, who has been actively investigating Vina’s death, was also seen at the location. Accompanying him were Titin Prialianti, a former convict in the Vina case and attorney for Saka Tatal, as well as Vina’s friends Mega and Widi, who had testified earlier in the PK trial.
To ensure security and smooth proceedings during the inspection, dozens of police officers were deployed to guard the area around SMP 11.
After completing the inspection at SMP 11, the legal team, along with judges and public prosecutors, proceeded to two additional crime scene locations: RT Pasren’s house and the Madura food stall. The final site to be inspected is the Talun Bridge flyover, another key location tied to the deaths of Vina and Eky.
This case has garnered widespread attention due to its complexity and the controversies surrounding it. The on-site inspection is expected to bring clarity to the sequence of events and ensure justice for both the victims and those involved in the legal proceedings.
FAQ: Vina and Eky Death Case
1. What is the Vina and Eky death case?
The Vina and Eky case involves the tragic deaths of two individuals, Vina and Eky, which allegedly resulted from a violent confrontation involving stone-throwing and a chase. The case has gained national attention, with six individuals convicted for their involvement. Legal proceedings, including a Peninjauan Kembali (PK) or judicial review, are currently ongoing to reassess the evidence and verdicts.
2. Who are the six convicts in this case?
The identities of the six convicts have not been detailed, but they have been held responsible for the deaths of Vina and Eky. Their legal team, led by prominent lawyer Otto Hasibuan, is actively defending them, seeking to challenge the initial convictions with new evidence.
3. What was the significance of the on-site inspection on September 27, 2024?
The on-site inspection, or local inspection, involved a detailed examination of key locations related to the deaths of Vina and Eky. This includes the area around SMP 11, which was said to be the site of a stone-throwing and chase, as well as other crime scene locations like RT Pasren’s house, a Madura food stall, and the Talun Bridge flyover. This inspection was crucial for re-evaluating the facts presented in court.
4. Who are the key figures involved in the case?
- Otto Hasibuan: The lead lawyer for the defense team representing the six convicts.
- Dede: A witness who initially claimed to see the incident but later retracted his testimony, admitting it was a lie.
- Dedi Mulyadi: Former Purwakarta Regent who has taken an active role in investigating the case.
- Titin Prialianti: A former convict in the case and attorney for Saka Tatal.
- Mega and Widi: Friends of Vina who testified during the PK trial.
5. Why did Dede retract his testimony?
Dede initially claimed to have witnessed the stone-throwing and chase but later admitted that his testimony was false. His retraction has raised questions about the reliability of earlier statements and evidence in the case.
6. What new evidence has emerged in the trial?
Otto Hasibuan, the defense attorney, has emphasized the introduction of new evidence, particularly data extracted from mobile phones, which he claims is “irrefutable scientific evidence.” This new data is expected to play a significant role in the judicial review.
7. What are the next steps in the legal process?
The PK trial is ongoing, with additional reviews of the evidence. The court is expected to make decisions regarding the validity of the new evidence and whether the convictions of the six individuals will stand or be overturned.
8. Why is this case so controversial?
The Vina and Eky case is controversial due to conflicting testimonies, retractions by key witnesses, and new evidence that has surfaced, casting doubt on the initial verdicts. The case has drawn widespread public attention and debate over the justice system.
9. What role does the community play in this case?
The case has attracted significant public interest, with crowds gathering at crime scenes and court hearings. This reflects the community’s deep concern and emotional involvement in seeking justice for Vina and Eky.
10. Where did the on-site inspection take place?
The local inspection took place in three locations:
- SMP 11: The site where the stone-throwing and chase allegedly occurred.
- RT Pasren’s house: Another significant location related to the case.
- Madura food stall and Talun Bridge flyover: Key areas tied to the deaths of Vina and Eky.
FOLLOW INDONESIAUPDATES.COM ON GOOGLE NEWS
