INDONESIAUPDATES.COM, News En – In a dramatic turn of events, Deputy Chairman of Commission III of the House of Representatives (DPR), Habiburokhman, has announced plans to summon both the Judicial Commission (KY) and the Supreme Court (MA) for a special meeting. This decision comes in response to the Surabaya District Court’s controversial acquittal of Ronald Tannur, who was accused of assaulting Dini Sera Afriyanti.
Commission III is alarmed by the acquittal and suspects that the panel of judges made serious errors in their decision. Habiburokhman has voiced strong concerns, stating that the court’s verdict was inconsistent with the evidence presented and was indicative of potential misconduct during the trial.
“The decision to acquit Ronald Tannur is deeply troubling,” said Habiburokhman. “It appears to ignore critical facts and raises serious questions about the judges’ conduct. We believe there are clear indications of procedural violations and an attempt to limit the disclosure of the truth.”
The panel of judges responsible for the acquittal includes Chief Judge Erintuah Damanik and members Mangapul and Heru Hanindyo. The DPR is calling for a thorough review of their conduct, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the judiciary.
The forthcoming special meeting with KY and MA aims to address these issues and ensure that justice is upheld. This development follows an audience with Dini Sera’s family, who are seeking justice after Tannur’s acquittal spared him from the 12-year prison sentence recommended by the prosecutor.
As the DPR prepares for this critical discussion, the case continues to spark debate and highlight the importance of judicial integrity in Indonesia.
FAQ: Ronald Tannur Acquittal and DPR’s Response
1. What is the issue with Ronald Tannur’s acquittal?
Ronald Tannur was recently acquitted by the Surabaya District Court in a case involving the assault of Dini Sera Afriyanti. The acquittal has sparked controversy, with concerns raised about the decision’s alignment with the evidence presented and potential misconduct during the trial.
2. Who is raising concerns about the acquittal?
Deputy Chairman of Commission III of the House of Representatives (DPR), Habiburokhman, has expressed strong concerns about the acquittal. He believes that the panel of judges made significant errors and is pushing for an investigation into their conduct.
3. What actions are being taken in response to the acquittal?
Commission III plans to hold a special meeting with the Judicial Commission (KY) and the Supreme Court (MA) to address the issues raised by the acquittal. The goal is to review the conduct of the judges involved and ensure that appropriate actions are taken.
4. Why does Commission III believe the acquittal was flawed?
Commission III argues that the decision was inconsistent with the trial’s facts and may have involved procedural violations. Concerns include limiting the disclosure of evidence and making conclusions prematurely.
5. Who were the judges involved in the acquittal?
The panel of judges who acquitted Ronald Tannur includes Chief Judge Erintuah Damanik and members Mangapul and Heru Hanindyo.
6. What is the significance of the special meeting with KY and MA?
The special meeting is intended to discuss the judicial handling of the case, assess the validity of the acquittal, and explore potential actions against the judges involved. It is a step towards ensuring transparency and accountability in the judicial process.
7. How did Dini Sera’s family react to the acquittal?
Dini Sera’s family is seeking justice and has voiced their concerns following the acquittal. They are supporting Commission III’s efforts to address the issue and ensure that justice is served.
8. What will happen next?
The DPR will schedule a special meeting with the KY and MA to further investigate the case. The outcome of this meeting will determine the next steps in addressing the issues raised by the acquittal and ensuring judicial accountability.
FOLLOW INDONESIAUPDATES.COM ON GOOGLE NEWS
